I find this interesting. A volunteer, free of charge ambulance service that wants to be included with the other ambulance service rights is how I read it. Assuming they are practicing effective and safe life-saving techniques I want them in on the party. What’s the downside?



www.latimes.com/local/la-me-hatzolah-20190210-story.html



Call both for me.
Is this just the unions trying to choke help?

They took our jorbs.

I'm a little confused as I only skimmed. It says they're volunteers. Does that mean the patients aren't charged if the Jewbulance arrives like they would be otherwise?

As a patient I'm all for getting me there asap so if there's another, that only good right?

But I can see why teamsters aren't behind it.

@ness , yes, free emergency healthcare.

First of all, Hatzolah is THE WORST! Trust me, I’m in the field.

They only respond to emergencies of Jewish patients, fuck what you hear. They don’t even complete all the transports. If the patient wants to go to a further hospital, Hatzolah will call another private ambulance company that services nursing homes and is owned by a member of their synagogue and have them do the transport. When it comes to delivering medical help, they do the bare minimum and to top it off, they get to CUT THE LINE in the emergency room because they have their own special doctor awaiting their patient.

It’s the most ridiculous thing in the medical field that everyone turns a blind eye to because well, Jewish people own the medical field.

And it’s only free if the person doesn’t have health insurance by the way. It’s a help their own religion thing.

KING KID, I love hearing a different perspective. I post stuff like this because I don't know and am looking to learn. Thank you for contributing to the conversation.