Nov 22, 2024 3:52:45 GMT mikec said:

Nov 22, 2024 0:00:58 GMT KING KID said:

Is it crazier than a biological man wanting to use a women’s bathroom though? I’m curious how liberal logic works when it comes to the word “crazy”. 

…yes, I do think it’s crazier than a trans person wanting to use the restroom with the gender that they choose to identify with. Even within the context of knowing that the easiest political win in the US right now is to do something that makes things more difficult for trans people.

Nah, I’m not buying what you are selling. Nobody is trying to make it harder for trans people. They're trying to make it harder for non trans people, but I’m sure the left isn’t ready for that talk yet. 🙄

If you have a penis, you should not be using the same bathroom as someone who has a vagina. Vice versa. I can’t imagine how anyone doesn’t see the problem with that. If you don’t see a problem with that, then I find you crazy too. 

Nov 22, 2024 3:52:45 GMT mikec said:

Nov 22, 2024 0:00:58 GMT KING KID said:

Is it crazier than a biological man wanting to use a women’s bathroom though? I’m curious how liberal logic works when it comes to the word “crazy”. 

…yes, I do think it’s crazier than a trans person wanting to use the restroom with the gender that they choose to identify with. Even within the context of knowing that the easiest political win in the US right now is to do something that makes things more difficult for trans people.

Without wanting to trawl up the entire debate again, you have to remember that the vast majority of men claiming to be trans are not motivated by some deep sense of gender dysphoria, but a sexual gratification they experience from being a woman. A large number of them are turned on by the perversion of being in the women's bathrooms and other places they shouldn't be.

I don't want people having their genders checked before they use the bathroom, but if I was a woman I totally wouldn't want a guy jerking off in the stall next to me. Not that I spend time imagining what I'd like if I was a woman....

iron maiden as someone who was hard on Trump for your make believe thought that he doesn’t care or have respect for women, I’m curious on your thoughts on all the women he has appointed to high government positions? As the only female who posts in this thread, I’m confused by your silence to all this great progress.

This Administration seems to be a pretty historic one for women rights. There are a lot of first time positions being held by a woman. I don’t understand why you haven’t been vocal in appreciation about it. Is it because bad man Trump is doing it? What’s more important to you then? Women rights or political parties?

Nov 22, 2024 5:00:22 GMT iNCY said:

Nov 22, 2024 3:52:45 GMT mikec said:

…yes, I do think it’s crazier than a trans person wanting to use the restroom with the gender that they choose to identify with. Even within the context of knowing that the easiest political win in the US right now is to do something that makes things more difficult for trans people.

Without wanting to trawl up the entire debate again, you have to remember that the vast majority of men claiming to be trans are not motivated by some deep sense of gender dysphoria, but a sexual gratification they experience from being a woman. A large number of them are turned on by the perversion of being in the women's bathrooms and other places they shouldn't be.

I don't want people having their genders checked before they use the bathroom, but if I was a woman I totally wouldn't want a guy jerking off in the stall next to me. Not that I spend time imagining what I'd like if I was a woman....

Not like we jerk off in stalls either….

….. -_- 

Nov 22, 2024 5:03:56 GMT KING KID said:

iron maiden as someone who was hard on Trump for your make believe thought that he doesn’t care or have respect for women, I’m curious on your thoughts on all the women he has appointed to high government positions? As the only female who posts in this thread, I’m confused by your silence to all this great progress.

This Administration seems to be a pretty historic one for women rights. There are a lot of first time positions being held by a woman. I don’t understand why you haven’t been vocal in appreciation about it. Is it because bad man Trump is doing it? What’s more important to you then? Women rights or political parties?

For actual cabinet positions, Trump has nominated 11/15 positions. Three positions are women - AG, Education and Homeland Security. None of the appointees are the first time a woman has held the role. In fact, every single cabinet position has been held by a woman. The VP also qualifies for this level, and obviously that’s not a woman in Trump’s administration.

Comparing Biden’s cabinet to Trump’s, seven of the current cabinet members are women, so Trump would need to go 4/4 on females to match Biden. Very history making.

Of the other “Cabinet-level” positions, all but one (Chief of Staff) have been held by a female before. Ironically, also (I believe) the only one that doesn’t have to be confirmed.

So yeah … he has the first female chief of staff. Kewl.

Nov 22, 2024 3:52:45 GMT mikec said:

Nov 22, 2024 0:00:58 GMT KING KID said:

Is it crazier than a biological man wanting to use a women’s bathroom though? I’m curious how liberal logic works when it comes to the word “crazy”. 

…yes, I do think it’s crazier than a trans person wanting to use the restroom with the gender that they choose to identify with.

Read that little piece back. Now, again.

Not everything is about them and their rights. The sole purpose of separate bathrooms for men and women is so both men and women, and boys and girls can have their privacy and feel safe in some of their most undignified and insecure moments. That is an actual right.

I don't have any right to be in a women's bathroom or dressing room as man, and suggesting I do, because of how I feel is absolutely crazy.

Some people may feel offended or unsafe by comments like that... ok, have some consideration for the women and girls who would feel incredibly unsafe or insecure in those moments, given they actually have some reason to be regardless of whether there is an actual threat or intention to cause harm or not.

Being told " No " you can't do something, doesn't measure up to what could very well be an invasion of privacy, and a complete disregard for the very measures in place to ensure the safety and well-being of all of us in the community.

Now, if this feels like a bit of a rant and what I'm saying is complete bullshit, remember who just lost an election, and why.

Nov 22, 2024 6:51:49 GMT KJ said:

Nov 22, 2024 5:03:56 GMT KING KID said:

iron maiden as someone who was hard on Trump for your make believe thought that he doesn’t care or have respect for women, I’m curious on your thoughts on all the women he has appointed to high government positions? As the only female who posts in this thread, I’m confused by your silence to all this great progress.

This Administration seems to be a pretty historic one for women rights. There are a lot of first time positions being held by a woman. I don’t understand why you haven’t been vocal in appreciation about it. Is it because bad man Trump is doing it? What’s more important to you then? Women rights or political parties?

For actual cabinet positions, Trump has nominated 11/15 positions. Three positions are women - AG, Education and Homeland Security. None of the appointees are the first time a woman has held the role. In fact, every single cabinet position has been held by a woman. The VP also qualifies for this level, and obviously that’s not a woman in Trump’s administration.

Comparing Biden’s cabinet to Trump’s, seven of the current cabinet members are women, so Trump would need to go 4/4 on females to match Biden. Very history making.

Of the other “Cabinet-level” positions, all but one (Chief of Staff) have been held by a female before. Ironically, also (I believe) the only one that doesn’t have to be confirmed.

So yeah … he has the first female chief of staff. Kewl.

WOW. Typical male response. Let the lady answer for herself. Sexist.

Oh, she can answer.

Just wanted to make sure she knew the truth and not just a bunch of male lies.

Sounds to me like you're trying to tell her how to think, like a toxic male.

Nov 22, 2024 5:03:56 GMT KING KID said:

iron maiden as someone who was hard on Trump for your make believe thought that he doesn’t care or have respect for women, I’m curious on your thoughts on all the women he has appointed to high government positions? As the only female who posts in this thread, I’m confused by your silence to all this great progress.

This Administration seems to be a pretty historic one for women rights. There are a lot of first time positions being held by a woman. I don’t understand why you haven’t been vocal in appreciation about it. Is it because bad man Trump is doing it? What’s more important to you then? Women rights or political parties?

Just cause he nominated women for these positions doesn't mean he likes/respects them. He does listen to his advisors SOMETIMES and his choices are hardly revolutionary (see KJ's post for stats).

I think he's a misogynistic pig. And while I know he's far from the only President to be, doesn't mean his appointing of 3 women moves the needle on this for me. It just shows he's can be a smart businessman. There are just too many comments and things I've seen from him throughout the years (pre and post Presidency) to change my mind on this.

Women's rights mean more to me than any political party. I don't vote per political party in any election. I vote as to who is best supporting the most agendas I care about and who I think is going to make a valiant attempt to lie the least on their promises. 

Nov 22, 2024 16:02:35 GMT iron maiden said:

Nov 22, 2024 5:03:56 GMT KING KID said:

iron maiden as someone who was hard on Trump for your make believe thought that he doesn’t care or have respect for women, I’m curious on your thoughts on all the women he has appointed to high government positions? As the only female who posts in this thread, I’m confused by your silence to all this great progress.

This Administration seems to be a pretty historic one for women rights. There are a lot of first time positions being held by a woman. I don’t understand why you haven’t been vocal in appreciation about it. Is it because bad man Trump is doing it? What’s more important to you then? Women rights or political parties?

Just cause he nominated women for these positions doesn't mean he likes/respects them. He does listen to his advisors SOMETIMES and his choices are hardly revolutionary (see KJ's post for stats).

I think he's a misogynistic pig. And while I know he's far from the only President to be, doesn't mean his appointing of 3 women moves the needle on this for me. It just shows he's can be a smart businessman. There are just too many comments and things I've seen from him throughout the years (pre and post Presidency) to change my mind on this.

Women's rights mean more to me than any political party. I don't vote per political party in any election. I vote as to who is best supporting the most agendas I care about and who I think is going to make a valiant attempt to lie the least on their promises. 

Don’t forget he’d only have two female cabinet appointments if his first AG candidate hadn’t withdrawn in disgrace for … *checks notes* …

Having sex with minors.

Nov 22, 2024 16:10:25 GMT KJ said:

Nov 22, 2024 16:02:35 GMT iron maiden said:

Just cause he nominated women for these positions doesn't mean he likes/respects them. He does listen to his advisors SOMETIMES and his choices are hardly revolutionary (see KJ 's post for stats).

I think he's a misogynistic pig. And while I know he's far from the only President to be, doesn't mean his appointing of 3 women moves the needle on this for me. It just shows he's can be a smart businessman. There are just too many comments and things I've seen from him throughout the years (pre and post Presidency) to change my mind on this.

Women's rights mean more to me than any political party. I don't vote per political party in any election. I vote as to who is best supporting the most agendas I care about and who I think is going to make a valiant attempt to lie the least on their promises. 

Don’t forget he’d only have two female cabinet appointments if his first AG candidate hadn’t withdrawn in disgrace for … *checks notes* …

Having sex with minors.

Read the legal note, pal.

Nov 22, 2024 16:02:35 GMT iron maiden said:

Nov 22, 2024 5:03:56 GMT KING KID said:

iron maiden as someone who was hard on Trump for your make believe thought that he doesn’t care or have respect for women, I’m curious on your thoughts on all the women he has appointed to high government positions? As the only female who posts in this thread, I’m confused by your silence to all this great progress.

This Administration seems to be a pretty historic one for women rights. There are a lot of first time positions being held by a woman. I don’t understand why you haven’t been vocal in appreciation about it. Is it because bad man Trump is doing it? What’s more important to you then? Women rights or political parties?

Just cause he nominated women for these positions doesn't mean he likes/respects them. He does listen to his advisors SOMETIMES and his choices are hardly revolutionary (see KJ 's post for stats).

I think he's a misogynistic pig. And while I know he's far from the only President to be, doesn't mean his appointing of 3 women moves the needle on this for me. It just shows he's can be a smart businessman. There are just too many comments and things I've seen from him throughout the years (pre and post Presidency) to change my mind on this.

Women's rights mean more to me than any political party. I don't vote per political party in any election. I vote as to who is best supporting the most agendas I care about and who I think is going to make a valiant attempt to lie the least on their promises. 

Are you happy for Linda McMahon?

Nov 22, 2024 16:12:30 GMT KING KID said:

Nov 22, 2024 16:10:25 GMT KJ said:

Don’t forget he’d only have two female cabinet appointments if his first AG candidate hadn’t withdrawn in disgrace for … *checks notes* …

Having sex with minors.

Read the legal note, pal.

They haven’t released the reports, and even you know what had leaked as disturbing.

You know how I know that? Because you posted it.

Nov 22, 2024 16:13:22 GMT KJ said:

Nov 22, 2024 16:12:30 GMT KING KID said:

Read the legal note, pal.

They haven’t released the reports, and even you know what had leaked as disturbing.

You know how I know that? Because you posted it.

"Allegedly."



nypost.com/2024/11/22/us-news/judge-postpones-trumps-sentencing-in-manhattan-hush-money-case/

Nov 22, 2024 16:13:03 GMT KING KID said:

Nov 22, 2024 16:02:35 GMT iron maiden said:

Just cause he nominated women for these positions doesn't mean he likes/respects them. He does listen to his advisors SOMETIMES and his choices are hardly revolutionary (see KJ 's post for stats).

I think he's a misogynistic pig. And while I know he's far from the only President to be, doesn't mean his appointing of 3 women moves the needle on this for me. It just shows he's can be a smart businessman. There are just too many comments and things I've seen from him throughout the years (pre and post Presidency) to change my mind on this.

Women's rights mean more to me than any political party. I don't vote per political party in any election. I vote as to who is best supporting the most agendas I care about and who I think is going to make a valiant attempt to lie the least on their promises. 

Are you happy for Linda McMahon?

Linda McMahon’s company has multiple sexual assault law suits while she was CEO, including underage ring boys.

She’s perfect for the children.

Nov 22, 2024 16:14:09 GMT KING KID said:

Nov 22, 2024 16:13:22 GMT KJ said:

They haven’t released the reports, and even you know what had leaked as disturbing.

You know how I know that? Because you posted it.

"Allegedly."



nypost.com/2024/11/22/us-news/judge-postpones-trumps-sentencing-in-manhattan-hush-money-case/

Gaetz stepped down from Congress (to keep report from being public) and withdrew from his AG nom.

He now is completely out of politics and will have to return to the private sector.

Sure. He’s good.

Nov 22, 2024 16:13:03 GMT KING KID said:

Nov 22, 2024 16:02:35 GMT iron maiden said:

Just cause he nominated women for these positions doesn't mean he likes/respects them. He does listen to his advisors SOMETIMES and his choices are hardly revolutionary (see KJ 's post for stats).

I think he's a misogynistic pig. And while I know he's far from the only President to be, doesn't mean his appointing of 3 women moves the needle on this for me. It just shows he's can be a smart businessman. There are just too many comments and things I've seen from him throughout the years (pre and post Presidency) to change my mind on this.

Women's rights mean more to me than any political party. I don't vote per political party in any election. I vote as to who is best supporting the most agendas I care about and who I think is going to make a valiant attempt to lie the least on their promises. 

Are you happy for Linda McMahon?

I'm not sure I particularly respect Linda McMahon.

Vince to me is cut from the same cloth as Trump. Linda used Vince (and WWE) to make her way. I'm not sure if I admire that or not, especially knowing what all she turned a blind eye to in order to do so. Then again maybe she did the best she could with what she had.